Latest on Organizations & Markets
The Future of Work: Frameworks for Leading Through Change
- Date
Alumni Food Entrepreneurs Team Up to Feed NYC Healthcare Workers
- Date
NYC Silkscreen Studio Swaps Fine Art Prints for Safety Signage
Actors and Architects of Ethical Behavior
Report: Number of Women Executives Remains Low
Organizations & Markets Faculty
CBS Faculty Research on Organizations & Markets
Should the Government Be Paying Investment Fees on $3 Trillion of Tax-Deferred Retirement Assets?
- Authors
-
Mattia Landoni and Stephen Zeldes
- Date
- April 1, 2025
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- Review of Financial Studies
Under standard assumptions, individuals and the government are indifferent between traditional tax-deferred retirement accounts and “front-loaded” (Roth) accounts. Adding investment fees to this benchmark, individuals are still indifferent but the government is not. We show that under weak conditions firms charge equal percent fees under both systems, yielding higher dollar fees under Traditional. We estimate that tax deferral increases demand for asset management services by $3.8 trillion, costing the government $23.4 billion in annual fees.
A Theory of Fiscal Responsibility and Irresponsibility
- Authors
-
Marina Halac and Pierre Yared
- Date
- March 18, 2025
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- Journal of Political Economy
We propose a political economy mechanism that explains the presence of fiscal regimes punctuated by crisis periods. Our model focuses on the interaction between successive deficit-biased governments subject to independently and identically distributed fiscal shocks. We show that the economy transitions between a fiscally responsible regime and a fiscally irresponsible regime, with transitions occurring during crises when fiscal needs are large. Under fiscal responsibility, governments limit their spending to avoid transitioning to fiscal irresponsibility.
The folly of America’s R&D cuts
- Authors
- Date
- March 10, 2025
- Format
-
Newspaper/Magazine Article
- Publication
- Financial Times
The welfare impact of recommendation algorithms
- Authors
-
Laura Doval and Alex Smolin
- Date
- March 1, 2025
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- ACM SIGecom Exchanges
In this letter, we summarize our recent work on the welfare impact of recommendation algorithms and propose questions for further study. We model recommendation algorithms as an information structure, which shapes how a third party takes actions that affect the welfare of different individuals in a population. Each recommendation algorithm thus induces a welfare profile, describing the expected payoffs of different individuals when the third party takes actions following the algorithm.
Leaders in Social Movements: Evidence from Unions in Myanmar
- Authors
- Date
- Forthcoming
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- American Economic Review
Social movements are catalysts for crucial institutional changes. To succeed, they must coordinate members’ views (consensus building) and actions (mobilization). We study union leaders within Myanmar’s burgeoning labor movement. Union leaders are positively selected on both ability and personality traits that enable them to influence others, yet they earn lower wages. In group discussions about workers’ views on an upcoming national minimum wage negotiation, randomly embedded leaders build consensus around the union’s preferred policy.
Elite Conflict and Industry Regulation: How Political Polarization Affects Local Restriction and State Preemption of the U.S. Hydraulic Fracturing Industry
- Authors
-
Lori Yue and Yuni Wen
- Date
- November 1, 2024
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- Political Power and Social Theory
We leverage Lachmann’s insight on elite conflict to explain the politics surrounding industry regulation in contemporary America and argue that conflicts between political elites create both constraints on industry players and opportunities for them to shape regulation. The widening urban-rural polarization of American society, in particular, has made urban political elites more liberal than those in state politics. The greater the political polarization of a state, the more local restrictions the nascent U.S.
The Entry-Deterring Effects of Synergies in Complementor Acquisitions: Evidence from Apple’s Digital Platform Market, the iOS App Store
- Authors
- Date
- July 15, 2024
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- Strategic Management Journal
Acquisitions can shift the market structure of a digital platform in ways that affect subsequent entries and hence the platform’s base of complementors. Synergies that complementor acquirers accrue can be entry-deterring. We develop a two-by-two typology of acquisition synergies in a multisided platform based on the two sides of a platform market (user side or complementary-technology side) and two sources of synergies (scale or scope economies).
Secrets at Work
- Authors
- Date
- July 1, 2024
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Organizational secrecy is central to national security, politics, business, technology, healthcare, and law, but its effects are largely unknown. Keeping organizational secrets creates social divides between those who are required to keep the secret and those who are not allowed to know it. We demonstrate that keeping organizational secrets simultaneously evokes feelings of social isolation and status, which have opposing effects on employee well-being.
Stable Matching on the Job? Theory and Evidence on Internal Talent Markets
- Authors
- Date
- June 6, 2024
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- Management Science
A principal often needs to match agents to perform coordinated tasks, but agents can quit or slack off if they dislike their match. We study two prevalent approaches for matching within organizations: centralized assignment by firm leaders and self-organization through market-like mechanisms. We provide a formal model of the strengths and weaknesses of both methods under different settings, incentives, and production technologies. The model highlights trade-offs between match-specific productivity and job satisfaction.