Abstract
Do corporate control transactions discipline the labor force? Consistent with synergies, we find that new disclosures of employee misconduct in the investment advisory industry drop by between 28 and 37% following mergers. Both targets and acquirers have better premerger misconduct records than the industry’s average firm and, within the subsample of merging firms, there is assortative matching on misconduct. Merger events facilitate further reductions in misconduct through separations of target firm employees with high misconduct. Many of these employees remain in the industry, suggesting that mergers play an important role in the redistribution of misconduct across firms.