Recent work suggests that secrecy is perceived as burdensome. A secrecy–burden relationship would have a number of consequences for cognitive, perceptual, social, and health psychology, but the reliability of these influences, and potential mechanisms that support such influences are unknown. Across 4 studies, the current work examines both the reliability of, and mechanisms that support, the influence of secrecy processes upon a judgment that varies with diminished resources (i.e., judgments of hill slant). The current work finds that a manipulation of secret "size" fails to reliably predict judged hill slant, whereas measurement and manipulation of preoccupation with a secret does reliably predict judged hill slant. Moreover, these effects are found to be mediated by judged effort to keep the secret, consistent with a resource-based mechanism of the burdens of secrecy.
Michael Slepian, N.P. Camp, and E.J. Masicampo
Journal Article
Publication Date
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Full Citation

Slepian, Michael, N.P. Camp, and E.J. Masicampo
. “Exploring the secrecy burden: Secrets, preoccupation, and perceptual judgments.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
, (April 01, 2015):