Complete List of Publications

2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |  2020 |  2019 |  2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 | 1992 | 1991 | 1990

2024

• Johnson, E. J., Sugerman, E. Morwitz, V., Johar, G., & Morris, M. (2024). Widespread misestimates of greenhouse gas emissions suggest low carbon competence. Nat. Clim. Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02032-z
• Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Sugerman, E. R., & Johnson, E. J. (2024). Exposing omitted moderators: Explaining why effect sizes differ in the social sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(12). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2306281121 
• Dellaert, B., Johnson, E. J., Duncan, S., Baker, T. (2024). Choice Architecture for Healthier Insurance Decisions: Ordering and Partitioning Together Can Improve Consumer Choice, Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221119086

2023

• Posner, N., Simonov, A., Mrkva, K., & Johnson, E. J. (2023). Dark defaults: How choice architecture steers campaign donations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(40).  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4258478 
• Johnson, E. J., & Mrkva, K. (2023). When nudges have societal-level impact. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x23000961 
• Reeck, C., Posner, N. A., Mrkva, K., & Johnson, E. J. (2023). Nudging app adoption: Choice architecture facilitates consumer uptake of mobile apps. Journal of Marketing, 87(4), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221141066 

2022

• Kalkstein, D. A., De Lima, F., Brady, S. T., Rozek, C. S., Johnson, E. J., & Walton, G. M. (2022). Defaults are not a panacea: Distinguishing between default effects on choices and on outcomes. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2022.24 
• Milovanovic, J., Shealy, T., Klotz, L., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2022). Pictures matter: How images of projected sea-level rise shape long-term sustainable design decisions for Infrastructure Systems. Sustainability, 14(5), 3007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053007
• Hancock, P. I., Klotz, L., Shealy, T., Johnson, E. J., Weber, E. U., Stenger, K., & Vuppuluri, R. (2022). Framing to reduce present bias in infrastructure design intentions. iScience, 25(3), 103954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103954
• Gachter, S., Johnson, E. J., & Herrmann, A. (2022). Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010597
• Li, Y., Krefeld-Schwalb, A., Wall, D., Johnson, E. J., Toubia, O., & Bartels, D. M. (2020). The more you ask, the less you get: When additional questions hurt external validity. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3713044 
• Dellaert, B. G. C., Johnson, E. J., Duncan, S., & Baker, T. (2022). Choice Architecture for Healthier Insurance Decisions: Ordering and partitioning together can improve consumer choice. Journal of Marketing, 88(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429221119086

2021

• Johnson, E. J. (2021). The Elements of Choice. Grantham Books Services.
• Sugerman, E. R., & Johnson, E. J. (2021). Local warming is real: A meta-analysis of the effect of recent temperature on climate change beliefs. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 42, 121-126. 
• Mrkva, K., Johnson, E. J., Reeck, C., & Posner, N. A. (2021). Design systems with your most vulnerable users in mind. Harvard Business Review. Online. 
• Mrkva, K., Posner, N. A., Reeck, C., & Johnson, E. J. (2021). Do nudges reduce disparities? Choice architecture compensates for low consumer knowledge. Journal of Marketing 85(4), 67-84. doi: 10.1177/0022242921993186

2020

• Wall, D., Crookes, R. D., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2020). Risky choice frames shift the structure and emotional valence of internal arguments: A query theory account of the unusual disease problem. Judgement and Decision Making 15(5), 685-703. 

2019

• Mrkva, K., Johnson, E. J., Gatcher, S., & Hermann, A (2019). Moderating loss aversion: Loss aversion has moderators, but reports of its death are greatly exaggerated. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 407-428. doi: 10.1002/jcpy.1156
• Jachimowicz, J.M., Duncan, S., Weber, E. & Johnson, E. (2019). When and why defaults influence decisions: a meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioural Public Policy, 1-28. doi: 10.1017/bpp.2018.43
• Jachimowicz, J., Szaszi, B., Lukas, M., Smerdon, D., Prabhu, J., & Weber, E.U., (2019). The Rising Tide Sinks the Smallest Boats: Why Economic Inequality Intensifies the Poor’s Financial Hardship. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/hpkb2

2018

• Attari, S.Z.,  Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E.U. (2018). Climate Change Advocacy and Ad Hominem Attacks. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts.
• Reeck, C., Gamma, K., & Weber, E.U. (2018). Feeling Green: Decision Modes Promoting Environmentally-Friendly Consumer Utility Choices. BEHAVE 2018 Book of Abstracts - Conference Proceedings, 279-280.
• Weber, E.U. (2018). Perception Matters: The Pitfalls of Misperceiving Psychological Barriers to Climate Policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 508-511. doi:10.1177/1745691618767910
• Shealy, T.,  Johnson, E., Weber, E., Klotz, L., Applegate, S., Ismael, D., & Bell, R.G. (2018). Providing descriptive norms during engineering design can encourage more sustainable infrastructure. Sustainable Cities and Society, 40, 182-188. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.017
• Klotz, L., Weber, E., Johnson, E., Shealy, T., Hernandez, M., & Gordon B. (2018). Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 1(5), 225-233. Doi: 10.1038/s41893-018-0054-8
• Creutzig F., Roy J., Lamb, W.F., Azevedo, I.M.L, Bruine de Bruin, W., Dalkmann, H., … & Weber, E.U. (2018). Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 260-263. doi: 10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1
• Weber, E.U. (2018). Combine and Conquer: A Paean to Methodological Pluralism. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(1), 29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.12.003
• Bang H., Shu, S., & Weber, E. (2018). The role of perceived effectiveness on the acceptability of choice architecture. Behavioural Public Policy, 1-21. doi:10.1017/bpp.2018.1
• Weber, E., & Klement, J. (2018). Risk Tolerance and Circumstances. CFA Institute Research Foundation, 55-69.

2017

• Ungemach C., Camilleri A.R., Weber E. U., Johnson E.J., & Larrick R.P. (2017). Translated Attributes as Choice Architecture: Aligning Objectives and Choices Through Decision Signposts, Management Science, Forthcoming; Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 17-30. 
• Atlas S.A., Johnson E.J., & Payne J.W. (2017). Time Preferences and Mortgage Choice, Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 415–429. doi: 10.1509/jmr.14.0481. 
• Sisco, M.R., Bosetti, V., & Weber, E.U. (2017). When do extreme weather events generate attention to climate change? Climatic Change, 143(1-2), 227–241. doi:10.1007/s10584-017-1984-2.
• Bosetti, V., Weber, E., Berger, Loïc, B., Budescu, D.V., Liu, N., & Tavoni, M. (2017). COP21 climate negotiators’ responses to climate model forecasts. Nature Climate Change, 7, 185 – 191. doi:10.1038/nclimate3208
• Weber, E.U. (2017). Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future. Nature Human Behavior, 1(0013). doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0013
• Weber, E. U. (2017). Understanding Public Risk Perception and Responses to Changes in Perceived Risk. In E. J. Balleisen, L. S. Bennear, K. D. Krawiec, & J. B. Wiener (Eds.), Policy Shock: Recalibrating Risk and Regulation after Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents and Financial Crises (pp. 58–81). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

2016

• Shealy T., Klotz L., Weber E. U., Johnson E.J, Greenspan Bell R., &  Harris, N., Alleviating Biases in Infrastructure Decisions for Sustainability: A Summary Of Five Experiments And A Call To Action For The Engineering Project Management Research Community, Conference: Engineering Project Organization Conference, At Cle Elum, WA
• Attari S.Z., Krantz D.H , & Weber E.U., Statements about climate researchers; carbon footprints affect their credibility and the impact of their advice. Climatic Change,  138(1), 325–338. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1713-2.
• Fox-Glassman, K.T, &  Weber E.U., What makes risk acceptable? Revisiting the 1978 psychological dimensions of perceptions of technological risks, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 75, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2016.05.003.
• Shealy T., Klotz L., Weber E. U., Johnson E.J., & Greenspan Bell R.,  Using Framing Effects to Inform More Sustainable Infrastructure Design Decisions, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 142(9), 04016037-1 to 04016037-9. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001152.
• Weber, E.U. & Johnson, E.J. (2016). Can we think of the future? Cognitive barriers to future-oriented thinking. In D. Messner & S. Weinlich (Eds.), Global Cooperation and the Human Factor in International Relations (pp. 139–154). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Foerde, K., Figner, B., Doll, B.D., Woyke, I.C., Braun, E.K., Weber, E.U., & Shohamy, D. (2016). Dopamine modulation of intertemporal decision-making: evidence from Parkinson disease, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(5), 657–667. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00929.

2015

• Ubel, P. Comerford, D. and Johnson E. J. (2015). Healthcare.gov 3.0 — Behavioral Economics and Insurance Exchanges. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 695-698. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1414771. 
• Weber, E. U. (2015). Climate change demands behavioral change: What are the challenges? Social Research: An International Quarterly, 82(3), 561–580. 
• Van Duijvenvoorde, A.C.K., Huizenga, H.M., Somerville, L.H., Delgado, M., Powers, A., Weeda, W.D.,Casey, B.J., Weber, E.U., & Figner, B. (2015). Neural correlates of expected risks and returns in risky
• choice across development. Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 1549-1560. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1924-14.2015.
• Knoll, M. A. Z., Appelt, K. C., Eric J Johnson, & Westfall, J. E. (2015). Time to Retire: Why Americans Claim Benefits Early and How to Encourage Them to Delay. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(1), 53–62. 
• Zaval, L., Markowitz, E.M., & Weber, E.U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for legacy’s sake. Psychological Science, 26(2), 231–236. doi: 10.1177/0956797614561266.
• Bartels, D. M., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Connecting cognition and consumer choice. Cognition, 135, 47–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.024.
• Zaval, L., Li, Y., Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2015). Complementary contributions of fluid and crystallized intelligence to decision making across the life span. In T.M. Hess, J. Strough, & C. Lockenhoff (Eds.), Aging and Decision Making: Empirical and Applied Perspectives (p. 149-168). Massachusetts: Academic Press. 

2014

• Truelove, H.B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E.U., Raimi, K.T., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127-138.
• Kunreuther H., S. Gupta, V. Bosetti, R. Cooke, V. Dutt, M. Ha-Duong, H. Held, J. Llanes-Regueiro, A. Patt, E. Shittu, and E.U. Weber (2014). Integrated risk and uncertainty assessment of climate change response policies. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J. C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.
• Kenning, P., Weber, E., & Welpe, I. (2014). The brain in business research. Schmalenbach Business Research, Special Issue 5/14, 1-6.
• Zaval, L., Keenan, E.A., Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2014). Understanding local warming: How warm days lead to increased belief in global warming. Nature Climate Change, 4, 143-147.
• Kunreuther, H., & Weber, E.U. (2014). Aiding decision making to reduce the impacts of climate change. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 397-411. 
• Attari, S., M., Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E. U. (2014). Reasons for cooperation or defection in real-world social dilemmas. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 316-334.
• Pinto, A., Steinglass, J.E., Greene, A.L.,Weber, E.U., Simpson H.B. (2014). Capacity to delay reward differentiates obsessive compulsive disorder and obsessive compulsive personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 75, 653-659.
• Patt, A. & Weber, E. U. (2014). Perceiving and communicating climate change uncertainty. WIREs: Climate Change, 5, 219-232.
• Gong, M., Heal, G., Krantz, D.H., Kunreuther, H., & Weber, E. U. (2014). The role of subsidies in coordination games with interconnected risk. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 395-407.
• Hershfield, H.E., Bang, H.M., & Weber, E.U. (2014). National differences in environmental concern and performance predicted by country age. Psychological Science, 25, 152-160.
• Gong, M., Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E. U. (2014). Why Chinese discount future financial and environmental gains but not losses more than Americans. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 49, 103-124.
• Li, Ye, Gao, Jie, Enkavi, A. Zeynep, Zaval, Lisa, Weber, Elke U., & Johnson, Eric J. (2014). Sound credit scores and financial decisions despite cognitive aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 
• Zaval, L., Keenan, E. A., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2014). How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nature Climate Change, 4, 143-147. 

2013

• Weber, E.U. (2013). Seeing is believing. Nature Climate Change, 3, 312-313.
• Weber, M., & Weber, E. U., & Nosic, A. (2013). Determinants of changes in investor risk taking. Review of Finance, 17, 847-883.
• Tobler, P. & Weber, E. U. (2013). Valuation for risky and uncertain choices. In: P. Glimcher & E. Fehr (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain, 2nd edition, (pp. 149-172). New York: Elsevier.
• Hardisty, D., Appelt, K.C., & Weber, E.U. (2013). Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 348-361.
• Hardisty, D., Thompson, K.J., Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E.U. (2013). How to measure discount rates? An experimental comparison of three methods. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 236-249.
• Weber, E. U. (2013). Doing the right thing willingly: Behavioral decision theory and environmental policy. In E. Shafir (Ed), The Behavioral Foundations of Policy, (pp. 380-397). Princeton University Press.
• Johnson, E. J., Hassin, R., Baker, T., Bajger, A. T., & Treuer, G. (2013). Can consumers make affordable care affordable? The value of choice architecture. PLoS ONE.
• Li, Y., Baldassi, M., Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E. U. (2013). Complementary Cognitive Capabilities, Economic Decision-Making, and Aging. Psychology and Aging. 28(3):595-613. 
• Smith, C., Goldstein, D. G., & Johnson, E. J. (2013). Choice without Awareness: Ethical and Policy Implications of Defaults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 32(2), 159-172.
• Toubia, O., Johnson, E. J., Evgeniou, T., & Delquié, P. (2013). Dynamic Experiments for Estimating Preferences: An Adaptive Method of Eliciting Time and Risk Parameters. Management Science 59(3), 613-640.
• Johnson, E. J. (2013). Choice theories: What are they good for? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(1),154–157. 
• Dietz, T., Stern, P., & Weber, E. U. (2013). Reducing carbon-based energy consumption through changes in household behavior. Daedalus, 142, 78-89.
• Markiewicz, L., Weber, E.U. (2013). DOSPERT's Risk-Taking Propensity Scale Predicts Excessive Stock Trading. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14, 65- 78. doi:10.1080/15427560.2013.762000
• Payne, J., Sagara, N., Shu, S., Appelt, K., Johnson, E. (2013). Life Expectancy as a Constructed Belief: Evidence of a Live-To or Die-By Framing Effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 46, 27 - 50.
• Lerner, J., Li, Y.,* & Weber, E.U. (2013). Sadder but not wiser: The myopia of misery. Psychological Science, 24, 72-79. 
• Slovic, Paul & Weber, Elke U. (2013). Perception of Risk Posed by Extreme Events. In: Regulation of Toxic Substances and Hazardous Waste (2nd edition) (Applegate, Gabba, Laitos, and Sachs, Editors), Foundation Press. 
• Weber, M., & Weber E.U., & Nosić, A. (2013). Determinants of changes in investor risk taking. Review of Finance, 17, 847-883. 
• Weber, E.U. (2013). Doing the right thing willingly: Behavioral decision theory and environmental policy. In E. Shafir (Ed), The Behavioral Foundations of Policy, (pp. 380-397). Princeton University Press.

2012

• Ames, D. R., Weber, E. U., & Zou, X.  (2012). Mind-reading in strategic interaction: The impact of perceived similarity on projection and stereotyping. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 96-110.
• Handgraaf, M.J.J., Schuette, P., Yoskowitz, N.A., Milch, K.F., Appelt, K.C., Weber, E.U. (2012). Web-conferencing as a viable method for group decision research. Judgement and Decision Making, 7, 659-668.
• Hardisty, D., Appelt, K.C., & Weber, E.U. (2012). Good or bad, we want it now: Present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Early View Articles.
• Johnson, E.J., Shu, S.B., Dellaert, B.G.C., Fox, C., Goldstein, D.G., Haeubl, G., Larrick, R.P., Payne, J.W., Schkade, D., Wansink, B., & Weber, E.U.  (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23, 487-504.
• Krosch, A., Figner, B., Weber, E.U. (2012). Choice processes and their post-decisional consequences in morally conflicting decisions. Judgement and Decision Making, 7, 224 - 234.
• Marx, S., & Weber, E. U. (2012). Decision making under climate uncertainty: The power of understanding judgment and decision processes. In T. Dietz & D.C. Bidwell (Eds.), Climate change in the Great Lakes region: Navigating an uncertain future. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
• Steinglass, J., Figner, B., Berkowitz, S., Weber, E.U., Walsh, T. (2012). Increased capacity to delay reward in anorexia nervosa. Journal of the International Neurological Society, 18, 1-8.
• Toubia, O., Johnson, E., Evgeniou T., & Delquie, P. (2012). Dynamic Experiments for Estimating Preferences: An Adaptive Method of Eliciting Time and Risk Parameters. Management Science. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1570
• Weber, E.U. & Johnson, E.J. (2012). Psychology and Behavioral Economics Lessons for the Design of a Green Growth Strategy. White Paper for Green Growth Knowledge Platform (OECD, UNEP, World Bank)

2011

• Ancker J., Weber E.U., Kukafka R. (2011). Effect of arrangement of stick figures on estimates of proportion in risk graphics. Medical Decision Making, 31, 143-150. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10369006
• Ancker J, Weber EU, Kukafka R. (2011). Effects of interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions. Medical Decision Making, 31, 130-142. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364847
• Appelt, K.C., Hardisty, D., & Weber, E.U.  (2011). Asymmetric discounting of gains and losses: A Query Theory Account. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43, 107-126. doi: 10.1007/s11166-011-9125-1
• Appelt, K.C., Milch, K.F., Handgraaf, M.J.J., & Weber, E. U. (2011). Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory (DMIDI) and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgment and Decision Making. 6, 252-262.
• Dinner, I., Johnson, E. J., Goldstein, D. G., & Liu, K. (2011, June 27).  Partitioning Default Effects: Why People Choose Not to Choose. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. Advance online publication.  doi: 10.1037/a0024354
• F. Bert, G.P. Podestá, S. Rovere, X. González, A. Menéndez, F. Ruiz Toranzo, M. Torrent, M. North,  C. Macal, P. Sydelko, E. U. Weber, and D. Letson  (2011). An agent based model to simulate structural and land use changes in agricultural systems of the argentine pampas. Ecological Modeling, 222, 3486 - 3499.
• Figner, B., & Weber, E.U.  (2011). Who takes risks, when, and why?: Determinants of risk taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 211-216. doi: 10.1177/0963721411415790
• Swim, J., Stern, P., Doherty, T., Clayton, S., Reser, J.P., Weber, E.U., Gifford, R., & Howard, G.S.  (2011). Psychology's contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 241-250. doi: 10.1037/a0023220
• Willemsen, M., Böckenholt, U., & Johnson, E. (2011). Preference Construction, Reference Dependence and Loss Aversion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General.
• Weber, E. U. & Ancker, J. S.  (2011). Cultural differences in risk taking and precaution: The relative roles of risk perception and risk attitude  In J.B. Wiener, M.D. Rogers, P.H. Sand, and J.K. Hammitt (Eds), The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe (pp. 480-491). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Weber, E.U., & Johnson, E. J. (2011). Query Theory: Knowing what we want by arguing with ourselves. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 91-92. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10002797
• Weber, E.U. & Stern, P. (2011). The American public’s understanding of climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 315-328. doi: 10.1037/a0023253
• Weber, E. U. (2011). Climate change hits home. Nature Climate Change, 1, 25-26. doi:10.1038/nclimate1070

2010

• Figner, B., Knoch, D., Johnson, E. J., Krosch, A. R., Lisanby, S. H., Fehr, E., and Weber, E.U. (2010). Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 538-539. doi:10.1038/nn.2516
• Hardisty, D. H., Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2010).  A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21, 86-92. doi: 10.1177/0956797609355572
• Weber, E. U. & Morris, M. W. (2010). Culture and judgment and decision making: The constructivist turn. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 410-419. doi: 10.1177/1745691610375556
• Weber, E.U.  (2010). On the coefficient of variation as a predictor of risk sensitivity: Behavioral and neural evidence for the relative encoding of outcome variability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 395-399. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.03.003
• Weber, E. U. (2010).  Risk attitude and preference.  Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 79-88. doi: 10.1002/wcs.5
• Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332-342. doi: 10.1002/wcc.41
• Figner, B., & Murphy, R. O. (2010). Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A Kuehberger, & R. Kanyard (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
• Figner, B., Weber, E. U., Steffener, J., Krosch, A. R., Lai, G., Wager, T. D. & Johnson, E. J. (2010). Asymmetries in intertemporal choice: Neural systems and the directional evaluation of immediate versus future rewards. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, St. Louis, USA.

2009

• Arora, P., Peterson, N., Krantz, D. H., Hardisty, D. J., & Reddy, K. (2009). When is a social dilemma not a dilemma? Experimental evidence for the impact of social affiliation on cooperation. Academia.
• Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 709-730.
• Figner, B., Mackinlay, R., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1420297
• Figner, B., & Schaub, S. (2009). Development of adaptive risky decision making: Risk sensitivity in judgment and choice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Chicago, USA.
• Shome, D. & Marx, Sabine & Appelt, K. & Arora, Poonam & Balstad, Roberta & Broad, K. & Freedman, A. & Handgraaf, Michel & Hardisty, David & Krantz, D. & Leiserowitz, Anthony & LoBuglio, M.. (2009). The psychology of climate change communication: A guide for scientists, journalists, educators, political aides, and the interested public. Center for Research on Environmental Decisions.
• Hardisty, D. J., Orlove, B., & Milch, K. (2009). Temporal Discounting of Losses. Center for Research on Environmental Decisions.
• Hardisty, D. J., & Santiago, R. B. (2009). The effects of text and video mediated communication on group polarization. Doctoral Thesis.
• Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016433 
• Letson, D., Laciana, C. E., Bert, F., Weber, E. U., Katz, R. W., Gonzalez, X. I., & Podesta, G. (2009). Value of perfect ENSO phase predictions for agriculture: Evaluating the impact of land tenure and decision objectives. Climatic Change, 97, 145-170.
• Milch, K. F., Weber, E. U., Appelt, K. C., Handgraaf, M. J. J., & Krantz, D. H. (2009). From individual preference construction to group decisions: Framing effects and group processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 242-255.
• Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53-85.

2008

• Goldstein, D., Johnson, E. J, & Sharpe, W. (2008). Choosing outcomes versus choosing products: Consumer-focused retirement investment advice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 440-456.
• Johnson, E. (2008). Economics: Tilt the table toward good choices [Review of the book Nudge]. Science, 11(321), 203.
• Johnson, E. (2008). Explicit and implicit strategies in decision making. In C. Engel & W. Singer (Eds.), Better than conscious? Decision making, the human mind, and implications for institutions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Johnson, E. (2008). Man, my brain is tired: Linking depletion and cognitive effort in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 14-16.
• Johnson, E. J., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Willemsen, M.C. (2008). Process models deserve process data: Comment on Brandstatter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006). Psychological Review, 115(1), 263-272.
• Johnson, E. J., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Willemsen, M.C. (2008). Postcript: Rejoinder to Brandstatter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig. Psychological Review, 115(1), 272-273.
• Laciana, C. E., & Weber, E. U. (2008). Correcting expected utility for comparisons between alternative outcomes: A unified parameterization of regret and disappointment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 1-17.
• Podesta, G., Weber, E. U., Laciana, C., Bert, F., & Letson, D. (2008). Agricultural decision making in the Argentine Pampas: Modeling the interactions between uncertain and complex environments and heterogeneous and complex decision makers. In T. Kugler, J. C. Smith, T. Connolly, & Y.-J. Son (Eds.), Decision Modeling and Behavior in Complex and Uncertain Environments (pp.57-75). New York: Springer.
• Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2008). Decisions under uncertainty: Psychological, economic, and neuroeconomic explanations of risk preference. In P. Glimcher, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. New York: Elsevier.

2007

• Engel, C., & Weber, E. U. (2007). The impact of institutions on the decision how to decide. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3, 323-349.
• Johnson, E. J., Haubl, G., & Keinan, A. (2007). Aspects of endowment: A Query Theory of value construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(3), 461-474.
• Johnson, E. J., Pham, M. T., & Johan, G. (2007). Consumer behavior and marketing. In A. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgens (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford.
• Marx, S. M., Weber, E. U., Orlove, B. S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D. H., Roncoli, C., & Phillips, J. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and anlytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 47-58.
• Weber, E.U., Johnson, E.J., Milch, K.F., Chang, H., Brodschool, J.C., & Goldstein, D.G. (2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A Query Theory account. Psychological Science, 18(6), 516-523.

2006

• Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., Lohse, G. L., & Mandel, N. (2006). Designing marketplaces of the artificial with consumers in mind: Four approaches to understanding consumer behavior in electronic environments. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(1), 21-33.
• Blais, A.-R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 373-398.
• Buchan, N. R., Johnson, E. J., & Croson, R. T. A. (2006). Let's get personal: An international examination of the influence of communication, culture and social distance on other regarding preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60(3), 373-398.
• Johnson, E. J. (2006). Things that go bump in the mind: How behavioral economics could invigorate marketing. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 337-340.
• Weber, E. U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77(1-2), 103-120.
• Weber, E.U., & Johnson, E.J. (2006). Constructing Preferences from Memories. In S.Lichtenstein & P. Slovic (Eds.), The costruction of preference, (pp. 397-410). New York: Cambridge University Press.

2005

• Bellman, S., Kobrin, S. & Johnson, E. J. (2005). International differences in information privacy concern: Implications for the globalization of electronic commerce. Unpublished manuscript.
• Eich, D., & Figner, B. (2005). Having attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and substance use disorder: A review of the literature. In R. Stohler & W. Rössler (Eds.). Dual diagnosis. The evolving conceptual framework. Bibliotheca Psychiatrica, 172, 92-104.
• Johnson, E. J., Steffel, M., & Goldstein, D. G. (2005). Making better decisions: From measuring to constructing preferences. Health Psychology, 24(4), S17-S22.
• Waldvogel, D., Figner, B., & Eich, D. (2005). Illicit methadone injecting during methadone maintenance treatment in a specialised out-patient clinic. Swiss Medicine Weekly, 135, 644-646.
• Weber, E. U., Ames, D., & Blais, A.R. (2005). 'How do I choose thee? Let me count the ways': A textual analysis of similarities and differences in modes of decision-making in the USA and China. Management and Organization Review, 1(1), 87-118.

2004

• Ames, D., Flynn, F., & Weber, E. U. (2004). It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 461-474.
• Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., Kobrin., S. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2004). International differences in information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers. Information Society, 20(5), 313-324.
• Buchan, N. R., Croson, R., & Johnson, E. J. (2004). When do fair beliefs influence bargaining behavior? Experimental bargaining in Japan and the United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 181-190.
• Camerer, C. F., & Johnson, E. J. (2004). Thinking about attention in games: Backward and forward induction. In I. Brocas & J. Carillo (Eds.), The Psychology of Economic Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Figner, B., Caflisch, C., & Eich, D. (2004). Methadone maintenance treatment: The patients' view. Suchtmedizin in Forschung und Praxis, 6, 142.
• Figner, B., & Voelki, N. (2004). Risky decision making in a computer card game: An information integration experiment. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 135-139.
• Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534-539.
• Johnson. E. J., Moe, W. W., Fader, P. S., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2004). On the depth and dynamics of online search behavior. Management Science, 50(30), 299-308.
• Johnson, E. J. (2004). Defaults and donation decisions. Transplantation, 78(12), 1713-1716.
• Johnson, E. J. (2004). Rediscovering risk. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 23(1), 2-6.
• Johnson, J. G., Wilke, A., & Weber, E. U. (2004). Beyond a trait view of risk-taking: A domain-specific scale measuring risk perceptions, expected benefits, and perceived-risk attitudes in German-speaking populations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35(3), 153-163.
• Nunes, J., Hsee, C., & Weber, E. U. (2004). The effect of cost structure on consumer purchase and payment intentions. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 23(1), 43-53.
• Weber, E. U. (2004). The role of risk perception in risk management decisions: Who's afraid of a poor old-age? In O. S. Mitchell & S. P. Utkus (Eds.), Pension design and structure: New lessons from behavioral finance. Part I. Research on decision-making under uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A.-R. (2004). Predicting risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review, 111, 430-445.

2003

• Caflisch, C., Figner, B., & Eich, D. (2003). Biperiden for excessive sweating from methadone. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 386-387.
• Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2003). Cognitive lock-in and the power law of practice. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 62-75.
• Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338-1339.

2002

• Gnam, G., Figner, B., & Eich, D. (2002). Patient satisfaction in a Zurich drop-in clinic, an outpatient site for treatment of dependency diseases. Schweizer Archiv für Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 6, 289-291
• Johnson, E. J., Bellman, S., & Lohse, G. L. (2002). Defaults, framing and privacy: Why opting in-opting out. Marketing Letters, 13(1), 5-15.
• Johnson, E. J., Camerer, S., Sen, S., & Rymon, T. (2002). Detecting failures of backward induction: Monitoring information search in sequential bargaining. Journal of Economic Theory, 104(1), 16-47.
• Mandel, N. & Johnson, E. J. (2002). When web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 235-245.
• Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290.

2001

• Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2001). To opt-in or opt-out: That depends on the question. Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 25-27.
• Johnson, E. J. (2001). Digitizing consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 331-336.
• Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286.

2000

• Lohse, G. L., Bellman, S., & Johnson, E. J. (2000). Consumer buying behavior on the internet: Findings from panel data. Journal of Interactive marketing, 14, 15-29.
• Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (2000). Culture and individual judgment and decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 32-61.

1999

• Chapman, G., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, confirmatory search, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(2), 115-53.
• Hsee, C. K., & Weber. E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 165-179.
• Lohse, G. S., Bellman, S., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Predictors of online buying behavior. Communications of the ACM, 42, 32-48.
• West, P., Ariely, D., Bellman, S., Bradlow, E., Huber, J., Johson, E. J., Khan, B., Little, J., & Schkade, D. (1999). Agents to the rescue? Marketing Letters, 10(3), 285-301.

1998

• Morwitz, V., Greenleaf, E., & Johnson, E.J. (1998). Divide and prosper: Why firms divide prices instead of charging a single price. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 453-63.
• Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. K. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception, but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards perceived risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205-1217.

1997

• Johnson, E. J., Meyer, R. J., Hardie, B., & Anderson, P. (1997). Watching customers decide: Process measures add insights to choice modeling experiments. Marketing Research, 9(1), 32-38.
• Lohse, G. S., & Johnson, E. J. (1997). A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 28-34.
• Weber, E.U., & Milliman, R. A.. (1997). Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science, 43(2), 123-144.
• Winer, R., Deighton, J., Gupta, S., Johnson, E. J., Mellers, B., Morwitz, V., O'Guinn, T., Rangaswamy, A., & Sawyer, A. (1997). Choice in computer-mediated environments. Marketing Letters, 8(3), 287-96.

1995

• Chapman, G., & Johnson, E.J. (1995). Preference reversals in monetary and life expectancy evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 300-17.
• Meyer, R. J., & Johnson, E. J. (1995). Empirical generalizations in the modeling of consumer choice. Marketing Science, 14(3), G180-9.
• Weber, E.U., Goldstein, W.M., & Barlas, S. (1995). And let us not forget memory: The role of memory processes and techniques in the study of judgment and choice. In J.R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, D.L. Medin (Eds.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol 32. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective (pp. 33-82). San Diego: Academic Press. doi 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60307-2

1994

• Weber, E.U. (1994). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effect of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 228-242.

1993

• Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E.J., Luce, M.F., & Payne, J.W. (1993). Correlation, conflict, and choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 931-951.
• Hardie, B., Johnson, E.J., & Fader, P. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science, 12(4), 378-394.
• Johnson, E. J., Bettman, J., & Payne, J.W. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7(1), 35-51.
• Morwitz, V., Johnson, E.J., & Schmittlein, D. (1993). Does measuring intent change behavior? Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 46-61.

1992

• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J.R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131.
• Payne, J. W., Bettman, J.R., Coupey, E., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). A constructive process view of decision making: Multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychologica, 80, 107-141.

1990

• Johnson, E. J., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Decision Research: A Field Guide. London: SAGE.
• Thaler, R., & Johnson, E.J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36(6), 643-660.