Innovation in the School’s curriculum is key to preparing students for today’s dynamic business environment. Columbia Business School depends on faculty with expertise and creativity to identify curricular gaps and develop new courses. While course creation requires time and effort, it meaningfully shapes student learning and contributes to academic excellence.
Your division chair and the Senior Vice Dean of Curriculum and Programs (SVD-CP) are available to discuss curriculum questions. The School’s Samberg Institute for Teaching Excellence offers additional support and guidance on instruction: [email protected].
This guide outlines the process for developing and proposing a new course, including expectations, best practices, and key steps from concept to approval.
Step 1: Define the Course Vision
Who Are the Students? Start by clearly identifying the course’s target audience.
- Expected enrollment: Consult with the division chair and SVD-CP and review enrollment data by program from similar courses to understand School and student needs.
- Program alignment: Which program(s) will this course serve? (MBA, EMBA, MS, PhD)
- Backgrounds: Consider students’ varied academic and professional experiences.
- Student needs: What career and personal development needs will this course address?
What Will Students Achieve? Define clear, measurable learning outcomes that answer the following questions.
- What specific skills or knowledge will students gain?
- How does this course advance their career readiness or academic development?
- What unique value does this course provide for their personal and professional growth?
Step 2: Position the Course in the Curriculum
Curriculum Integration: Map where this course fits within the CBS ecosystem.
- Prerequisites: List foundational courses that students must complete first.
- Unique value: What gap does this course fill that existing offerings don't address?
- Related courses: Review the catalog to identify specialized electives and consult with instructors to determine how this course complements others.
- Foundations: Describe how this course builds on core courses or foundational electives.
- Pathway consideration: If this course might fit into a curriculum pathway, notify the division chair or CIC representative early.
Step 3: Create the Assessment Framework
Assessment: How will instructors effectively and fairly measure student learning and foster accountability?
- Multiple touchpoints: Use multiple methods (project, exams, participation) and checkpoints to evaluate progress.
- Balanced approach: Use a combination of team and individual deliverables to enable collaboration and individuality.
- Clear expectations: Provide clear instructions and rubrics for all deliverables.
- Team project guidelines: Clearly define expectations and include evaluations of individuals’ contributions.
- Distributed grading: Avoid excess concentration of grading weight in one (or a few) deliverable(s).
- Participation guidelines: Assign no more than 30% weight on class participation.
- Participation rubric: Create a clear rubric for scoring attendance, poll responses, and other contributions.
- Exam procedures: If using final exams, review exam administration procedures.
- Academic integrity: For remote quizzes/exams, require Proctorio use to promote integrity. Consult the Proctorio faculty guide and Canvas module.
Step 4: Design for Engagement and Learning
Teaching Strategy: How will instructors’ teaching strategies ensure student engagement and learning?
- Pre-work assignments: Enhance class preparation and maximize in-person learning.
- Multimedia content: Develop brief (2-5 minute) videos to introduce or reinforce key concepts.
- Discussion culture: Foster meaningful dialogue both in and outside the classroom.
- Active learning elements: Replace passive lectures with hands-on activities, simulations, project work, and student presentations that require students to apply concepts and engage directly with the material.
- Strategic participation: Use cold/warm calling thoughtfully to maintain engagement and accountability.
- Technology integration: Identify opportunities to meaningfully incorporate technology and AI into activities and assignments.
- Guest Speakers: Strategically recruit industry experts, designing interactive activities that leverage their unique experiences and insights.
Step 5: Develop Course Logistics
Staffing Strategy: What is the plan for ensuring that qualified instructors will be available?
- Instructor qualifications: Describe instructors’ academic and practical expertise and its relevance.
- Long-term sustainability: If this course might be on a curriculum pathway, devise a plan to staff it every year.
- Co-teaching arrangements: If this course will be co-taught, explain how each instructor adds value. Co-teaching between full-time faculty and adjunct instructors requires approval from both Senior Vice Deans (Curriculum and Programs; and Faculty Affairs).
Course Structure: How will the structure of the course support its learning goals?
- Duration: Determine whether the course should be 6 or 12 weeks (1.5 or 3 credits).
- Session format: Set session length to be 90 minutes (biweekly) or 3 hours (weekly), considering engagement.
- Office hours: List the timing and format of weekly office hours.
Step 6: Align with School Policies
Policy Compliance: How will course policies support learning goals?
- Institutional standards: Align with School policies and norms on grading, attendance, device usage, AI, etc.
- Student policies: Clarify grading curve, attendance, class recording, and AI policies.
- Exam standards: Final exams must be during the official exam period, and exam format can be either in person or remote with Proctorio.
- Classroom culture: Foster the CBS core culture of being present, prepared, participating without distractions.
- Course-specific policies: Determine appropriate course policies and practices.
- First-day attendance: Require attendance on the first day if it is essential for enrollment.
Step 7: Build the Syllabus
Syllabus: How will the syllabus set expectations to ensure students understand all requirements?
- Use the CBS syllabus template. See also the University’s instructions for how to structure a syllabus.
- State coursework expected.
- Explain the amount and timing of the workload.
- Provide assignment descriptions, deadlines, and submission procedures.
- State course policies.
- Cover attendance, device usage, AI usage.
- Include any special policies, such as travel.
- Provide session information.
- Include a course outline with topic coverage and reading by session.
- Clarify the timing of each session, noting any non-standard sessions.
Step 8: Gather Stakeholder Feedback
Development Process: Which stakeholders can inform course development?
- Division leadership: Consult with division chair and Dean’s Office (SVD-CP).
- Faculty colleagues: Consult with instructors of related core and elective courses.
- Teaching experts: Consult with Samberg Institute for Teaching Excellence on course design and teaching methods.
- Early feedback: Gather input from each stakeholder before proposal submission.
Step 9: Submit the Proposal
Submission Process: How should the proposal be submitted?
- Faculty and division review: Submit the syllabus to the division chair for initial review.
- School review: The division submits the approved syllabus to the SVD-CP and CIC.
- Final decision: Expect a decision approximately 3 weeks after divisional submission.
- Approximate deadlines by term in which the course will launch:
- Spring course: Submit by August.
- Summer course: Submit by December.
- Fall course: Submit by March.
Course Proposal Timeline
Timeline | Milestone |
9 months before course launch | Develop course idea and consult division chair, faculty with related courses, and Dean’s Office (SVD-CP) |
8 months prior | Meet with the Samberg for support on course design |
6 months prior | Develop detailed syllabus, including structure, assessments, policies |
~5 months prior and by term-specific deadline (March for Fall, August for Spring, December for Summer) | Submit syllabus to division chair for initial review by divisional faculty |
Within 1 week of divisional review | Division submits to Dean’s Office and CIC |
3 weeks from divisional submission | Decision provided to division after CIC and Dean’s Office review |