Skip to main content
Official Logo of Columbia Business School
Academics
  • Visit Academics
  • Degree Programs
  • Admissions
  • Tuition & Financial Aid
  • Campus Life
  • Career Management
Faculty & Research
  • Visit Faculty & Research
  • Academic Divisions
  • Search the Directory
  • Research
  • Research Resources
  • Teaching Excellence
Executive Education
  • Visit Executive Education
  • For Organizations
  • For Individuals
  • Program Finder
  • Online Programs
  • Certificates
About Us
  • Visit About Us
  • CBS Directory
  • Events Calendar
  • Leadership
  • Our History
  • The CBS Experience
  • Newsroom
Alumni
  • Visit Alumni
  • Update Your Information
  • Lifetime Network
  • Alumni Benefits
  • Alumni Career Management
  • Women's Circle
  • Alumni Clubs
Insights
  • Visit Insights
  • AI & Transformative Tech
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Finance & Investing
  • Magazine
CBS Landing Image
Faculty & Research
  • Academic Divisions
  • Search the Faculty
  • Research
  • Faculty Resources
  • News
  • More 

Entrepreneurship & Innovation

See the latest research, articles and faculty on the Entrepreneurship & Innovation Area of Expertise at Columbia Business School.

Jump to main content

Latest on Entrepreneurship & Innovation

No articles have been found by those filters.

Pagination

  • First page 1
  • Ellipsis …
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Current page 11

Entrepreneurship & Innovation Faculty

Entrepreneurship & Innovation Research

Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage

Authors
C. Bledsoe, B. Sherin, Adam Galinsky, N. Headley, C. Heimer, E. Kjeldgaard, J. Lindgren, J. Miller, M. Roloff, and D. Uttal
Date
January 1, 2007
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Northwestern University Law Review

The article explores the history of the U.S. Institutional Review Board (IRB) system and its penetration into local institutions. The author found that the Code of Federal Regulations Governing the Protection of Human Subjects in Research develops categories of risk for which various types of medical research are required. In this regard, research or reviews identified with the highest level of assessed risk can only be considered by a convened panel of IRB members.

Read More about Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage

Power, propensity to negotiate and moving first in competitive interactions

Authors
J. Magee, Adam Galinsky, and D.H. Gruenfeld
Date
January 1, 2007
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Five experiments investigated how the possession and experience of power affects the initiation of competitive interaction. In Experiments 1a and 1b, high-power individuals displayed a greater propensity to initiate a negotiation than did low-power individuals. Three additional experiments showed that power increased the likelihood of making the first move in a variety of competitive interactions.

Read More about Power, propensity to negotiate and moving first in competitive interactions

Negotiation at a distance: The MEDIA approach

Authors
Roderick I. Swaab and Adam Galinsky
Date
January 1, 2007
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Negotiation
Read More about Negotiation at a distance: The MEDIA approach

Unilever's Mission for Vitality, Case #5-307-501

Authors
D. Austen-Smith, Adam Galinsky, K. Chung, and C. LaVanway
Date
January 1, 2007
Format
Case Study
Publisher
Kellogg Case Publishing

Dove and Axe were two highly successful brands owned by Unilever, a portfolio company. Dove was a female-oriented beauty product brand that exhorted "real beauty" and not the unachievable standards that the media portrayed. In contrast, Axe was a brand that purportedly "gives men the edge in the mating game." Their risqué commercials always portrayed the supermodel-type beauty ideal that Dove was trying to change.

Read More about Unilever's Mission for Vitality, Case #5-307-501

Power and perspectives not taken

Authors
Adam Galinsky, J. Magee, M. Inesi, and D.H. Gruenfeld
Date
December 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Psychological Science

Four experiments and a correlational study explored the relationship between power and perspective taking. In Experiment 1, participants primed with high power were more likely than those primed with low power to draw an E on their forehead in a self-oriented direction, demonstrating less of an inclination to spontaneously adopt another person's visual perspective.

Read More about Power and perspectives not taken

Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets

Authors
L. Kray, Adam Galinsky, and E. Wong
Date
July 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

By comparing reality to what might have been, counterfactuals promote a relational processing style characterized by a tendency to consider relationships and associations among a set of stimuli. As such, counterfactual mind-sets were expected to improve performance on tasks involving the consideration of relationships and associations but to impair performance on tasks requiring novel ideas that are uninfluenced by salient associations. The authors conducted several experiments to test this hypothesis.

Read More about Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets

Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions

Authors
G. Ku, Adam Galinsky, and J. Murnighan
Date
June 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Counter to the "start high, end high" effect of anchors in individual judgments and dyadic negotiations, 6 studies using a diverse set of methodologies document how and why, in the social setting of auctions, lower starting prices result in higher final prices. Three processes contribute to this effect. First, lower starting prices reduce barriers to entry, which increase traffic and generate higher final prices. Second, lower starting prices entice bidders to invest time and energy (creating sunk costs) and, consequently, escalate their commitments.

Read More about Starting low but ending high: A reversal of the anchoring effect in auctions

Ownership, Incentives, and the Hold-Up Problem

Authors
Tim Baldenius
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
The RAND Journal of Economics

Vertical integration is often proposed as a way to resolve hold-up problems, ignoring the empirical fact that division managers tend to maximize divisional (not firmwide) profit when investing. This paper develops a model with asymmetric information at the bargaining stage and investment returns taking the form of cash and "empire benefits." Owners of a vertically integrated firm then will provide division managers with low-powered incentives so as to induce them to bargain "more cooperatively," resulting in higher investments and overall profit as compared with non-integration.

Read More about Ownership, Incentives, and the Hold-Up Problem

Power, optimism, and risk-taking

Authors
Cameron Anderson and Adam Galinsky
Date
January 1, 2006
Format
Journal Article
Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology

Five studies investigated the hypotheses that the sense of power increases optimism in perceiving risks and leads to more risky behavior. In Studies 1 and 2, individuals with a higher generalized sense of power and those primed with a high-power mind-set were more optimistic in their perceptions of risk. Study 3 primed the concept of power nonconsciously and found that both power and gain/loss frame had independent effects on risk preferences. In Study 4, those primed with a high-power mind-set were more likely to act in a risk-seeking fashion (i.e., engage in unprotected sex).

Read More about Power, optimism, and risk-taking

Pagination

  • First page 1
  • Ellipsis …
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Page 32
  • Current page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Ellipsis …
  • Last page 41
Official Logo of Columbia Business School

Columbia University in the City of New York
665 West 130th Street, New York, NY 10027
Tel. 212-854-1100

Maps and Directions
    • Centers & Programs
    • Current Students
    • Corporate
    • Directory
    • Support Us
    • Recruiters & Partners
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Accessibility
    • Privacy & Policy Statements
Back to Top Upward arrow
TOP

© Columbia University

  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn

External CSS

Homepage Breadcrumb Block

Back to top

Accessibility Tools

English French German Italian Spanish Japanese Russian Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Arabic Bengali