Columbia CompStak Net Effective Rent Index
The Columbia CompStak Rent Index (CCRI) is the first quality-adjusted commercial real estate rent index built on net effective rents. Developed by Faculty at Columbia Business School's Paul Milstein Center for Real Estate using CompStak's verified lease transactions, CCRI establishes a new public benchmark for measuring U.S. commercial rent performance across office, retail, and industrial markets nationwide. By combining transaction-level lease data with academic rigor, the partnership bridges real-world market intelligence and institutional research standards to deliver a transparent, constant-quality view of rent movement over time.
Index Methodology
The Quality-Adjusted Rent Index is calculated using a hedonic regression model that controls for property characteristics such as size, age, location quality, and lease terms. This methodology isolates pure rent changes from compositional shifts in the types of properties transacting.
Real Estate Rent Index Research
Through the Columbia CompStak Quality-Adjusted Commercial Real Estate Rent Index, we construct a new quality-adjusted commercial real estate rent index for U.S. office, retail, and industrial markets using more than one million CompStak lease transactions from 2010-2025.
National Net Effective Rent
- Disclosure: Anyone using this data needs to name the index (Columbia CompStak Rent Index) and cite our methodology paper as the origin.
- Suggested Citation to Use: Abramson, Boaz and Choudhary, Gaurav and Kim, Joel Joonyoung and Piskorski, Tomasz and Qiu, Ziyi and Van Nieuwerburgh, Stijn and Yu, Wayne, The Columbia CompStak Quality-Adjusted Commercial Real Estate Rent Index (December 01, 2025). Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 5841322, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5841322 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5841322
Featured Viewpoints
- Date
The Commercial Real Estate Ecosystem
What do Cutting-Edge Rent Indices Tell Us About the US CRE Market?
- Date
The Future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Privatization, Conservatorship, and the Limits of Demand-Side Housing Policy
Collaborated Viewpoints
- Date
2026 Alexander Bodini Foundation Prize Competition Winners
- Date
CBS team places 2nd at 2026 Kellogg Real Estate Venture Competition
- Date
Student Faculty Interview with Adjunct Assistant Professor of Business Jane Yang '10
- Date
The Future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Privatization, Conservatorship, and the Limits of Demand-Side Housing Policy
Real Estate Expertise
Faculty Contributors
Latest Academic Citations
Financing the AI Buildout
This paper analyzes the AI infrastructure boom as a physical capital buildout centered on data centers, power infrastructure, cooling systems, and specialized chips. It studies how this buildout is financed through hyperscalers, third-party developers, REITs, private credit, and structured finance, and discusses the implications for leverage, risk allocation, and financial stability.
The Great Revaluation: COVID-19 and the Structural Transformation of the American Housing Market
This chapter summarizes the tectonic shifts that took place in the U.S. housing market between 2019 and 2025. I explore the roles of remote work and lower interest rates in the dramatic rise of aggregate house prices, the"flattening" of the urban bidrent curve in the cross-section of locations, and the fiscal implications of the "Urban Doom Loop." I discuss how mortgage lock-in effects may have stabilized house prices in the wake of more recent increases in interest rates, at the expense of residential mobility.
Working From Home and the Office Real Estate Apocalypse
- Authors
- Date
- February 2, 2026
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- American Economic Review
Working from home resulted in a sharp contraction in office demand. We built a valuation model to find that the office stock lost about 45% in value. More for low-quality buildings and in cities with a larger IT sector and less for trophy buildings. We discuss the implications for mortgage lenders and the vitality of cities.
Manufacturing Risk‐free Government Debt
- Authors
- Date
- February 1, 2026
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- Journal of Financial Economics
In the presence of aggregate risk, governments face a trade-off between insuring taxpayers or bondholders. The literature assumes that the government can finance deficits at the risk-free rate, protecting bondholders at the expense of taxpayers. We characterize the implications of this assumption on the surplus process. Under reasonable debt dynamics, counter-cyclical debt issuance that protects taxpayers against adverse macro-economic shocks is limited in time and scope, and comes at the expense of higher long-run risk.
Exorbitant Privilege Gained and Lost: Fiscal Implications
- Authors
- Date
- December 1, 2025
- Format
-
Journal Article
- Journal
- Journal of Political Economy
We study three centuries of U.K. fiscal history. Before WW-I, when the U.K. dominated global bond markets, the U.K.’s government debt was not always fully backed by its future surpluses, even after accounting for the seigniorage revenue from convenience yields. As predicted by theories of safe asset determination, investors concentrate extra fiscal capacity in a single country, the global safe asset supplier, based on relative macro fundamentals, and its debt growth may temporarily outstrip what is warranted by its own macro fundamentals.
Monetary Tightening and U.S. Bank Fragility in 2023: Mark-to-Market Losses and Uninsured Depositor Runs?
We develop a conceptual framework and an empirical methodology to analyze the effect of rising interest rates on the value of U.S. bank assets and bank stability. We mark-to-market the value of banks' assets due to interest rate increases from Q1 2022 to Q1 2023, revealing an average decline of 10%, totaling about $2 trillion in aggregate. We present a model illustrating how asset value declines due to higher rates can lead to self-fulfilling solvency runs even when banks' assets are fully liquid.