Skip to main content
Official Logo of Columbia Business School
Academics
  • Visit Academics
  • Degree Programs
  • Admissions
  • Tuition & Financial Aid
  • Campus Life
  • Career Management
Faculty & Research
  • Visit Faculty & Research
  • Academic Divisions
  • Search the Directory
  • Research
  • Faculty Resources
  • Teaching Excellence
Executive Education
  • Visit Executive Education
  • For Organizations
  • For Individuals
  • Program Finder
  • Online Programs
  • Certificates
About Us
  • Visit About Us
  • CBS Directory
  • Events Calendar
  • Leadership
  • Our History
  • The CBS Experience
  • Newsroom
Alumni
  • Visit Alumni
  • Update Your Information
  • Lifetime Network
  • Alumni Benefits
  • Alumni Career Management
  • Women's Circle
  • Alumni Clubs
Insights
  • Visit Insights
  • Digital Future
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • 21st Century Finance
  • Magazine
Insights
  • Digital Future
  • Climate
  • Business & Society
  • Entrepreneurship
  • 21st Century Finance
  • Magazine
  • More 
Economy & Policy

Interest Rates Under Trump: What His Policies Could Mean for the Fed’s Next Moves

Average Read Time:

The president-elect’s proposals — and his relationship with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell — will define the country’s economy in 2025 and beyond.

Article Author(s)
  • Jonathan Sperling
Published
December 18, 2024
Publication
Finance & Economics
Jump to main content
Jerome Powell

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell

Category
Thought Leadership
Topic(s)
Economics and Policy
Save Article

Download PDF

About the Researcher(s)

Brett House

Brett House

Professor of Professional Practice in the Faculty of Business
Economics Division

0%

Share
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Threads
  • Share on LinkedIn

With days to go until the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump, all eyes are on the economic impact of his policies. 

In recently released minutes from a December meeting of the Federal Reserve’s rate-setting body, the Federal Open Markets Committee (FOMC), officials anticipated risks of higher-than-expected inflation, partly driven by potential tariffs from Trump, as they made a “finely balanced” decision to lower interest rates. The Fed's last move — a quarter-point rate cut — marked the third and final cut of 2024 amid strong-enough economic growth and slowly fading inflation.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell noted during a press conference that “conditions in the labor market are now less tight than they were in 2019,” and that interest rate cuts would occur more slowly in 2025. 

With Trump's presidency imminent, the Fed seems to be adopting a “wait-and-see” approach to further rate cuts, according to Brett House, Professor of Professional Practice at Columbia Business School’s Economics Division. 

While unemployment rates have risen mildly from historic lows and inflation remains above target, Trump’s proposed tariff and immigration policies are likely to drive price pressures up, according to House. This, combined with Trump’s indication that he expects to have greater say in setting policy rates, could make it even more difficult for the Fed to get policy rates down further.

To make better sense of this dynamic, as well as the Fed’s outlook for 2025, House spoke with CBS Insights to shed light on what Americans can expect.

CBS: What is the Fed’s reasoning for a 25 basis points (bps) cut, and can we expect more cuts in 2025?

Brett House: The FOMC delivered a hawkish 25 bps cut accompanied by updated projections that show fewer rate cuts anticipated in 2025, along with higher inflation, lower unemployment, and slightly stronger growth. 

The Committee made it clear that the bar for further cuts is higher than it’s been for the 100 bps of cuts that have been delivered since September: a relatively new member of the Committee voted against the most recent cut and three non-voting members also appear to have opposed it.

The past year’s cuts have reflected the Fed’s assessment that monetary policy has been weighing on economic activity. Its models have implied that lower real interest rates have been necessary to preserve the economy’s post-pandemic soft landing and job market strength.

Nevertheless, the economy has remained more robust than expected, with relatively high real GDP growth rates, strong consumer spending, unemployment rates just above historic lows, and headline inflation rates that remain above the Fed’s average 2% year-on-year target. The Fed is now adopting a wait-and-see or data-dependent approach that will deliver further rate cuts only if emerging economic indicators imply that lower rates are necessary to support growth and would not conflict with inflation coming down to the Fed’s target.

CBS: How are President-elect Trump’s policy proposals likely to affect inflation and what do they mean for future rate cuts?

House: The incoming administration’s policy proposals are likely to increase upward price pressures and limit the extent to which the Fed can deliver on additional rate cuts in 2025. Significant tariffs on imports from Canada, China, and Mexico—the United States’ three biggest trading partners—will push up prices for American businesses and consumers. 

Throttling immigration inflows and deporting workers will increase costs for key sectors in the US economy, such as agriculture and construction. These cost increases will be passed onto business and consumers in the form of higher final prices. 

Without any clarity on complementary decreases in federal spending, new and continued tax cuts are likely to lead to larger federal deficits. This will boost aggregate demand without increasing aggregate supply, ratcheting up prices further. 

President-elect Trump’s push to reduce regulatory burdens might offset some of these price pressures by making it easier for businesses to operate. But, on balance, the Trump agenda is likely to make it harder to get inflation down, which would curtail the Fed’s rate-cutting path.

CBS: What are the implications for businesses and consumers?

House: Cuts in the fed funds target rate don’t necessarily translate into lower borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, particularly because this most recent cut, as well as a series of future cuts, have already been anticipated by bond markets. The cost of servicing variable-rate loans, such adjustable-rate mortgages, home-equity credit lines, credit-card balances, and some business borrowing, will come down, which will create a little easing in budgets. But interest rates on most fixed-rate mortgages and car loans are benchmarked to US Treasury yields, and these rates have risen since the Fed’s initial 50 bps cut in September. Similarly, the reference rate on new student loans was set in July and isn’t affected by the Fed’s cuts this autumn.

CBS: What can the policies and economy from President-elect Trump’s first term tell us about his second?

House: A comparison of the two Trump terms is not straightforward as economic conditions now are quite different from both 2017 and the period of the pandemic-induced shutdowns. During President-elect Trump’s first term, far more policy changes tended to get mooted on late-night posts to social media, in off-the-cuff musings, and in casual statements than were delivered by the White House. For instance, the first Trump administration vowed to completely change US trade policy, but it produced a renegotiated NAFTA that was only mildly altered from the original agreement. On fiscal policy, the first Trump administration’s biggest achievement was the passage of revenue cuts under its Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, with little to show for the White House’s repeated promises to support infrastructure development.

As others have observed, the President-elect’s major appointments look quite different this time around than they did in his first administration: they generally have less experience in running the bureaucratic structures they are being handed. On the one hand, this positions them as less likely to respect norms and settled precedents, with a view to pushing through substantial changes. On the other hand, their more limited experience could make it harder for them to achieve the reforms they seek.

CBS: How do you anticipate President-elect Trump and Fed Chair Powell will interact in the first 100 days or so of the presidency?

House: The Executive and Legislature are typically expected to keep some distance from the independent decision-making of the Fed in the fulfillment of its mandate to achieve price stability and maximum employment. But President-elect Trump has indicated on several occasions that he expects to have a greater say in setting policy rates. In fact, US Presidents already have a significant say in the Fed’s processes through the designation of the Chair of the FOMC and by making appointments to the Fed’s Board of Governors when members’ fixed terms conclude. Additionally, the Fed’s mandate and broad approach to monetary policy are reviewed roughly every five years and the President has an opportunity to contribute to this process.

We know from decades of experience that central banks tend to achieve better results in controlling inflation when their day-to-day work is kept at arm’s length from politicians. Government leaders have a persistent incentive to stoke economic growth rates higher than is consistent with their central bank’s inflation target in order to curry temporary favor with voters.

Ironically, the more politicians meddle with central bankers’ work, the harder they make it to bring down inflation and achieve the lower policy rates that governments hope will benefit businesses and consumers. The best thing President-elect Trump could do to get the lower fed funds rate he desires would be to commit to smaller federal deficits, eschew his tariff and immigration promises, and stay quiet on the Fed.  

About the Researcher(s)

Brett House

Brett House

Professor of Professional Practice in the Faculty of Business
Economics Division

Related Articles

Business and Society
Capital Markets and Investments
Economics and Policy
Finance
Finance and Economics
Politics
Date
November 26, 2024
US Army soldiers
Business and Society
Capital Markets and Investments
Economics and Policy
Finance
Finance and Economics
Politics

Dollars and Dominance: How Military Strength Secures Financial Power

A new paper co-authored by Professor Pierre Yared shows how geopolitical strength and financial privilege reinforce each other, with implications ranging from interest rates to national security.

  • Read more about Dollars and Dominance: How Military Strength Secures Financial Power about Dollars and Dominance: How Military Strength Secures Financial Power
Economics and Policy
Ethics and Leadership
Future of Work
Labor
Management
The Workplace
Date
December 03, 2024
US immigration document
Economics and Policy
Ethics and Leadership
Future of Work
Labor
Management
The Workplace

Give Us Your Tired, Your Poor … and Your High-Skilled!

New research by Columbia Business School faculty shows how increasing the number of high-skilled immigrants can spur regional entrepreneurship and economic growth without the cost of other economy-boosting strategies.

  • Read more about Give Us Your Tired, Your Poor … and Your High-Skilled! about Give Us Your Tired, Your Poor … and Your High-Skilled!
Leadership
Politics
Research Findings
Date
November 19, 2024
Divided nation illustration
Leadership
Politics
Research Findings

Is Open-Mindedness a Liability in Today’s Polarized Politics?

Research by Professor Mohamed Hussein uncovers the social cost of engaging with opposing political views, offering new insights into America’s growing partisan divide and what it means for fostering cooperation.

  • Read more about Is Open-Mindedness a Liability in Today’s Polarized Politics? about Is Open-Mindedness a Liability in Today’s Polarized Politics?
Business Economics and Public Policy
Capital Markets and Investments
Corporate Finance
Economics and Policy
Finance
Finance and Economics
World Business
Date
November 12, 2024
Famous euro sign in Frankfurt am Main under blue sky.
Business Economics and Public Policy
Capital Markets and Investments
Corporate Finance
Economics and Policy
Finance
Finance and Economics
World Business

Who Really Owns Europe’s Wealth? New Research Uncovers the True Flow of Capital Across the Euro Area

A CBS study uses large-scale data to better estimate where money in Europe comes from — and where it goes.

  • Read more about Who Really Owns Europe’s Wealth? New Research Uncovers the True Flow of Capital Across the Euro Area about Who Really Owns Europe’s Wealth? New Research Uncovers the True Flow of Capital Across the Euro Area

External CSS

Homepage Breadcrumb Block

Articles A11y button

Official Logo of Columbia Business School

Columbia University in the City of New York
665 West 130th Street, New York, NY 10027
Tel. 212-854-1100

Maps and Directions
    • Centers & Programs
    • Current Students
    • Corporate
    • Directory
    • Support Us
    • Recruiters & Partners
    • Faculty & Staff
    • Newsroom
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy & Policy Statements
Back to Top Upward arrow
TOP

© Columbia University

  • X
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn