Globalization

With multinational corporations (MNCs) increasingly taking public stances on sociopolitical issues such as immigration, LGBTQ+ rights, and racism, it is imperative that International Business (IB) research keeps pace with normative societal debates. In this paper, we introduce the concept of corporate sociopolitical activism (SPA) to the IB literature and develop theory on why MNCs consistently or inconsistently engage in SPA in response to the same issue in their home country and a host country.

We examine how a startup's strategic positioning—specifically, whether it communicates a disruptive or collaborative stance toward incumbents—affects its ability to attract talent. Although prior research has examined how this positioning influences investors, its impact on potential employees remains less clear. We conduct a field experiment with an early-stage climate technology startup in India, randomly assigning job seekers to a disruptive or collaborative positioning condition.

Firms with political connections to a regime with an authoritarian history face a dilemma when the regime undergoes a democratic transition. Such connections provide an essential competitive advantage when the regime is in power but become a liability when an institutional transition brings democratic change. This study theorizes that when mass protests expose a regime’s distorted policies favoring elites over others and signal a high probability of regime turnover, firms may hedge against the risks associated with their political connections by engaging in philanthropy.

Why do frontier technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) diffuse unequally across geographies? While prior work attributes this trend to demand-side factors like complementary assets, we theorize that technology entrepreneurs' strategic choice to target hub markets creates search frictions for firms outside of those markets, contributing to lower technology adoption.

Multinational enterprises are at the centre of policy debates in low- and middle-income countries. As some of the most productive and innovative firms in the world, which are at the core of global supply chains, multinational enterprises (MNEs) can accelerate development in the countries hosting them, both directly with their presence, and indirectly through linkages to local economic actors.

Multinational enterprises are at the centre of policy debates in low- and middle-income countries. As some of the most productive and innovative firms in the world, which are at the core of global supply chains, multinational enterprises (MNEs) can accelerate development in the countries hosting them, both directly with their presence, and indirectly through linkages to local economic actors.